Stump The Chumps,
56:34 MINS

Episode 13: Stump the Chumps – take 3

July 26, 2017

Finally, our much awaited third try with Stump the Chumps.  This time one of our registrars Dr. Brian Grainger challenges us with a case of a young patient.  This is a longer episode, which I guess reflects the fact that sometimes, when the diagnosis is not obvious, you just have to take your time.  Enjoy!

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

9 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Sujeewa Dissanayake
Sujeewa Dissanayake
4 years ago

very nice case which is helpful for my RACGP AUS fellowship KFP exam

thanks you

Hamilton Semple
5 years ago

Yes, excellent forensic clinical reasoning.
Great work. Even with 57 visits, who would have thought of that result.
Thank you.

Himanshu Mirani
Himanshu Mirani
6 years ago

Great flow of reasoning…

Harry
Harry
8 years ago

Thanks, gentlemen. That was a classic. Keep them coming.

Gene Chung
Gene Chung
8 years ago

And the discussion of DDx was really terrific.

Gene Chung
Gene Chung
8 years ago

Art and Nick, this was entirely unfair to you. Earlier accounting of the number of encounters would have led you down the correct path. I did enjoy the image of you sneaking around the patient room however.

Tim
Tim
8 years ago

Hi Art and Nick,

Enjoyed the episode, thought I would leave a comment to let you know there are listeners out there! This one is from your alma mater (Toronto). I don’t think it matters whether the case ends up stumping or not, what’s important is walking through the clinical reasoning and understanding the diagnostic process and potential pitfalls. Thanks and keep up the good work.

Tim
GIM Fellow

Scroll to top
9
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
Share via
Copy link
Powered by Social Snap